Financial crime sentinel
Alerts you can still explain.
Transaction Monitoring
A spreadsheet cannot preserve the why.
When a workbook keeps changing, yesterday's thresholds and decisions become hard to prove.
Transaction Monitoring keeps the chain intact
- Versioned rules raise alerts on a deterministic engine.
- Each alert shows the rule, live parameters, period, measured values and matched transactions.
- New rules stay in shadow until compliance signs off the running parameters.
Transaction Monitoring
What the record keeps
Each safeguard is enforced by the product, not left to memory or convention.
The reasoning is stored on the alert, not reconstructed later
Every alert carries the rule it came from, the version of that rule, the parameters in force when it ran, and the transactions that triggered it. A reviewer opens evidence, not a score.
The same inputs raise the same alerts, every time
The engine is a frozen path: no sampling, no model drift, no ordering that changes between runs. Re-run last quarter and you get last quarter's alerts — which is what makes an alert something you can defend rather than something you have to explain.
Nothing goes live without a recorded sign-off
A rule cannot reach the live state until an accepted compliance sign-off exists, and the sign-off snapshots the parameters that will actually run — not the library's defaults. Until then it runs in shadow, where you can read what it would have raised.
20 versioned detection rules
Each rule carries a definition version that is snapshotted onto every alert it raises, so an alert stays attributable to the rule as it read that day.
Financial crime sentinel
See it on your own rules.
A walkthrough on your book and your thresholds, not a canned demo.
One focused request · a response prepared around your needs